Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.27 acre, more or less, in the city of Chesapeake, Virginia PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-560-JAG ONLY!
as 2:2018cv00560
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.27 acre, more or less, in the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, located on parcel identification no. 0330000002110, identified as lot 1 containing 30.0 acres, more or less, et al and Bethel I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bethel, Jr v. Clark et al
as 3:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Raymond V . Bethel, Jr
Defendant:
Harold W. Clark, Nancy G. Parr and Carol C. Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel, Jr v. Director, Virginia Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00011
Petitioner:
Raymond Vaughn Bethel, Jr
Respondent:
Director, Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bethel v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Jane E. Bethel
Defendant:
City of Norfolk , David Sullivan , Carolyn Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bethel v. Depart. of State Police Sex Offender Registry
as 3:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Bethel, Jr.
Defendant:
Depart. of State Police Sex Offender Registry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Depart of State Police
as 3:2014cv00170
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Bethel, Jr.
Defendant:
Depart of State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. O'Sullivan et al
as 3:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Bethel, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim O'Sullivan and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Clarke et al
as 3:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Bethel, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Jim O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00692
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Bethel, Jr.
Defendant:
Pamela Smith and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
