Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gaddis v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2019cv07334
Defendant:
Big Ten Conference, Inc. and National Collegiate Athletic Association
Plaintiff:
Versie Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sevald v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2019cv07354
Defendant:
Mid-American Athletic Conference, Inc., The National Collegiate Athletic Association and The Big Ten Conference, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven S. Sevald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEVALD v. THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv02819
Defendant:
MID-AMERICAN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE, INC., THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN S. SEVALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GADDIS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv02792
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC., BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
VERSIE GADDIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2019cv00433
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and The Big Ten Conference, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2018cv03660
Defendant:
BIG TEN CONFERENCE, NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. The Big Ten Conference, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv04338
Plaintiff:
Tanya Nelson
Defendant:
The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerrick v. The Big Ten Conference, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09485
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerrick
Defendant:
Big Ten Conference, Inc., The and National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
