Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Benjamin Cannon v. City of Petaluma, et al
as 13-16609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN PHILIP CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PETALUMA, PETALUMA POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAN FISH and others
Sally Steinhart v. County of Sonoma, et al
as 13-16266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALLY STEINHART
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SONOMA, BILL COGBILL, Sheriff-Coroner, M. SHANAHAN, Deputy Sheriff and others
Carmel Spiteri v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2011cv00822
Defendant:
Bill Cogbill, Does, Mercury Manzano and others
Plaintiff:
Carmel Spiteri
Carmel Spiteri v. Riverside County et al
as 2:2011cv04315
Defendant:
Bill Cogbill, Does, Mercury Manzano and others
Plaintiff:
Carmel Spiteri
Palomino v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
as 3:2011cv01329
Plaintiff:
Julio Palomino
Defendant:
California Forensic Medical Group, Taylor Fithian, County of Sonoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. City of Petaluma et al
as 4:2011cv00651
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Philip Cannon
Defendant:
City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma, City of Sonoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. City of Petaluma et al
as 3:2011cv00651
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Philip Cannon
Defendant:
City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma, City of Sonoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2010cv03592
Plaintiff:
Tamara Johnston
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Bill Cogbill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steinhart v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2010cv00841
Plaintiff:
Sally Steinhart
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Bill Cogbill, M. Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arias v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 4:2009cv00760
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sanchez Arias
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, J. A. Farrow, Bill Harm and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
