Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mazak v. William et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Defendant:
Farmer William, Bill Farmer, Daniel Elias and others
Plaintiff:
Steve H Mazak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parton v. Farmer et al
as 6:2021cv00661
Defendant:
Austin McConnell, Jacob B. Holloway, Bill Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Parton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as OKW/5:16-cv-00188
Plaintiff:
Floretta Brown , Kimberley Moulton , AC Bean and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Corporation , McKesson Corporation and others
Brown et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Floretta Brown , Kimberley Moulton , AC Bean and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Corporation , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Raniere et al v. Citigroup Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02448
Plaintiff:
Tara Raniere, Nichol Bodden, Mark A. Vosburgh and others
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., Citibank, N.A. and Citimortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 FLSA: Definitions
Brown et al v. Bayer et al
as 9:2010cv80267
Plaintiff:
Terry Brown, Glenda Brown, Scott Campbell and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown et al v. Bayer et al
as 3:2009cv02017
Plaintiff:
Terry Brown, Glenda Brown, Scott Campbell and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
