Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 17-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, DARRELL O. DUGAN, WILLIAM BRENNAN, Esq. and others
USA v. William Villella
as 17-2366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY VILLELLA, aka FLASH VILLELLA, aka WILLIAM ANTHONY VILLILLA, aka JOHN SALEM, aka BILLY VILLELLA, aka JOHNNY SALEM, aka WM VILLELA, aka WILLIAM VELLELLA, aka BILLY V. VILLELLA, aka WILLIAM A. VILLELLA, aka BILL VILLELLA, aka WILLIAM VILLELA
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2016cv01688
Petitioner:
MARK A. NIXON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER , STEPHEN ZAPPALA, JR. , BRUCE BEEMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
PARMS v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2016cv01033
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Defendant:
RICH FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER, FR. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2016cv02947
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE, LORRAINE M. RAMUNNO and BILL JUDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Doe,, Barb Doe, Bill Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. DOE et al
as 2:2016cv01038
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JANE DOE, BARB DOE, BILL DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, DANIEL P. BURNS, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
