Cases 1 - 10 of 767
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbett v. Aransas County
as 24-40162
Plaintiff:
Edward Manual Corbett
Defendant:
Aransas County, Bill Mills and Aransas County Detention Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00562
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Corbett v. Mills
as 24-40136
Plaintiff:
Edward Manual Corbett
Defendant:
Bill Mills, City of Rockport and Aransas County
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Sydney Zuiker, Nate Spinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingler v. Wayborn
as 24-10183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
Bill Wayborn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Texas Commission on Jail Standards, Tarrant County Hospital District, doing business as John Peter Smith Health Network and others
Easter v. Court Room 485th District Court et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jordan Easter and Jordan Beavers
Defendant:
Court Room 485th District Court, Judge Steven James and DA Jamie Jernigan
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullens v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Everett Jesse Sullens
Respondent:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery
as 24-10111
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Principle Agent in the State of Texas, Chris Woods, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
