Cases 31 - 40 of 104
BILLINGS v. GERMANY COUNTRY et al
as 1:2015cv01131
Plaintiff:
EDDIE BILLINGS, JR.
Defendant:
GERMANY COUNTRY and GERMANY COUNTRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BILLINGS v. IRS
as 1:2015cv01108
Plaintiff:
EDDIE H. BILLINGS, JR.
Indiana:
IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BILLINGS v. GAS STATION'S et al
as 1:2015cv01107
Plaintiff:
EDDIE H. BILLINGS, JR.
Defendant:
GAS STATION'S and SMOKE SHOPPEE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOSKINS v. COSBY
as 1:2015cv00342
Defendant:
BILL COSBY
Plaintiff:
HOMER E. HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG et al
as 4:2014cv00099
Defendant:
BILL BRUNNER, DENNIS CARR, CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, DEARBORN COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA, et al
as 4:2014cv00077
Defendant:
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, DEARBORN COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA, WILLIAM (BILL BILL) BRUNER, DONNIE BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
DOUG TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BILLINGS v. US ARMED FORCES PATRICK BASE
as 1:2014cv00653
Plaintiff:
EDDIE BILLINGS, JR.
Defendant:
US ARMED FORCES PATRICK BASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BILLINGS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2014cv00654
Plaintiff:
EDDIE H. BILLINGS, JR.
Defendant:
MARLA CLARK, K. MARK LOYD and PROSECUTORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vermillion v. Peru City of et al
as 3:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ryan Vermillion
Defendant:
Peru City of, Peru City Police Department, Andrew Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Vermillion v. Peru City of et al
as 3:2014cv00529
Plaintiff:
Ryan Vermillion
Defendant:
Peru City of , Peru Police Department , Andrew Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.