Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Canter v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Amber Canter
Defendant:
The State Of Maryland, The D.P.S.C.S. Secretary Robert L. Green, Roxbury Correctional Institution Warden, Carlos Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Collins v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2022cv01740
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Collins
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Bill Beaman, Getachew, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Resper v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00378
Defendant:
Wayne Resper, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Holly Hoover, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv03309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weddington v. BH Motors-Mr. Bill et al
as 1:2021cv02672
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Defendant:
BH Motors-Mr. Bill and Dave Tangand Title
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodgers v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2021cv02368
Plaintiff:
Arthur Rodgers
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Holly Hoover, Bill Beeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed
Ezeh, et al v. SunTrust Bank , et al.
as 8:2021cv01905
Plaintiff:
Ada Ezeh and Ezekiel Ezeh
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Bill Rogers and Anita Shipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
