Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Stuckey et al v. People Republic of China et al
as 4:2020cv07344
Defendant:
National Health Commission of the People Republic of China, Shi Zhengli, People Liberation Army and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Kenneth Stuckey, Anthony Grisby, M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Terrence Bingham
as 5:2020cv01387
Defendant:
Terrence Bingham
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205
Ronnie R. Govea v. Ben Lee et al
as 2:2020cv05443
Plaintiff:
Ronnie R. Govea
Defendant:
C. Bingham, R. Jackson, Ana Monterrosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OC Discount Nutrition LLC et al v. Bruno Terrance Vick et al
as 8:2020cv00802
Defendant:
Matthew Bingham, Jose Hernandez, Discount Nutrition LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OC Discount Nutrition LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Victoria Bingham v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv02053
Plaintiff:
Rachel Victoria Bingham
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schultz v. San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2019cv02468
Defendant:
Hoskins, Steve Moore, San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Chupa v. Armstrong Flooring, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09840
Plaintiff:
Michael Chupa
Defendant:
Michel Vermette, Donald Maier, Armstrong Flooring, Inc. and others
Bingham v. Checkr, Inc.
as 4:2019cv03653
Defendant:
Checkr, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Bingham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Edward Jordan v. Dr. Ben Lee et al
as 2:2019cv05182
Defendant:
S. Pina, Dr. C Bingham DDS, D. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2019cv00927
Plaintiff:
Oscar Bingham and Carolyn Bingham
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
