Cases 11 - 20 of 429
Soto v. Origin Materials, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Antonio F. Soto
Defendant:
Origin Materials, Inc., Richard J. Riley, John Bissell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Amco Insurance Company v. Bissell Homecare, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03477
Defendant:
AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY and BISSELL HOMECARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Rebeka Rodriguez v. Bissell Inc
as 2:2023cv05447
Plaintiff:
Rebeka Rodriguez
Defendant:
Bissell Inc and Bissell Inc a Michigan corporation doing business as www.Bissell.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cara Rowland v. BISSELL Homecare Inc
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARA ROWLAND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
BISSELL HOMECARE INC
Thad Woods v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv03533
Plaintiff:
Thad Woods
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy Bissell, Deputy Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Franzini v. Bissell Homecare, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02985
Plaintiff:
Corey Franzini
Defendant:
Bissell Homecare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Kendrick v. Bissell, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Sumatra Kendrick
Defendant:
Bissell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cara Rowland v. BISSELL Homecare Inc
as 23-8012
Respondent:
CARA ROWLAND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
BISSELL HOMECARE INC
Quintez Talley v. Bissell, et alIn re: Quintez Talley v. Bissell, et al
as 23-1264
Petitioner:
In re: QUINTEZ TALLEY
Respondent:
SGT. BISSELL, C/O BARRETTO, C/O MARTIN and others
Tabot v. Bissell Homecare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
PEARL TABOT
Defendant:
BISSELL HOMECARE, INC. and Bissell Homecare, Inc. doing business as Bissell Homecare doing business as Bissell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
