Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Santos v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv02576
Defendant:
Carlos Bivens, Case Manager Mr. Woodfall, Parole Officer Lyles and others
Plaintiff:
Erick Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodson v. Bivens
as 1:2024cv02328
Plaintiff:
George Dodson
Defendant:
Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv02327
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Respondent:
Warden Carlos Bivens
Petitioner:
Tavon D. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Corizon et al
as 1:2024cv02277
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon, Yes Care and Warden Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Causion-El v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Shannon Causion-El
Defendant:
Carlos Bivens
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Kemp v. Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
Michael Kemp
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections, Carlos Bivens, Todd Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
