Cases 31 - 40 of 3,047
Swartz v. Democratic Party, et al.
as 24-991
Plaintiff:
JESSE F. SWARTZ
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BLACK CAUCUS and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
WIRTZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA WIRTZ, DAVID WIRTZ, FRANCES WIRTZ and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC., ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Corenzo Mobery
as 24-3018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Corenzo Mobery, also known as Fat Black, also known as Snowman
USA v. Eural Black
as 24-1191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EURAL BLACK
Soloman v. Black, et al.
as 24-693
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEBIYU SHEFREW SOLOMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON BLACK, Atascadero Executive Director
Respondent:
ERIC VEGA, Officer, Badge #1013593
Black Farmers Agriculturalists Association, Inc., et al v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 24-5119
Plaintiff:
BLACK FARMERS AGRICULTURALISTS ASSOCIATION, INC., THOMAS BURRELL, MARY FERGUSON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and ZACH DUCHENEAUX, Administrator for United States Department of Agriculture's Farm Service Agency
US v. Maurice Adams
as 24-4077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE ADAMS, a/k/a Black
Black v. Case Farms, LLC
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Randy Black
Defendant:
Case Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181 Packers & Stockyard Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
