Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Beverly v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Charles Beverly
Defendant:
Blaise Smith and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beauregard Parish Police Jury et al v. McKinsey Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07278
Plaintiff:
Beauregard Parish Police Jury, Bossier Parish, Caddo Parish and others
Defendant:
McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams et al v. Smith et al
as 6:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS WILLIAMS and GASTON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Blaise Smith, DYLAN TOUPS, BLAKE GIROIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vega-Pabon v. Smith
as 6:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Raul Vega-Pabon
Defendant:
Blaise Smith
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Employment & Re-employment Rights of Uniformed Service Members
Richard v Grizzaffi et al
as 6:2020cv01404
Defendant:
James F Blair, Blaise Smith, Frank P Grizzaffi, III and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Michael Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morin v. Duhe et al
as 6:2020cv00592
Defendant:
Sheriff of St Mary Parish, 16th jdc district attorney, Blaise Smith and others
Plaintiff:
travis morin and Travis James Morin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soprano v. Smith
as 6:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Blaise Smith and Deboni Rollins
Plaintiff:
Tasha Soprano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carson v. Scott et al
as 6:2019cv00626
Defendant:
Paul Scott, Clair Mae, Gary Driskell and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Carson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pike v. Smith et al
as 6:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Blaise Smith, Gary Driskell and Paul Scott
Plaintiff:
Dustin Pike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pike v. Smith et al
as 6:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Blaise Smith and Paul Scott
Plaintiff:
Dustin Pike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
