Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Blevins v. Phillips et al
as 0:2010cv00107
Plaintiff:
Donald Blevins
Defendant:
Rebecca K. Phillips and David Flatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartholomew et al v. Blevins et al
as 5:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Bartholomew and Latonya Bartholomew
Defendant:
Donald Blevins, Jr., Linda Potter, Lexington Fayette Urban County Government (LFUCG) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Blevins v. SSA
as 6:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
William Howard Blevins
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Blevins v. Daviess County Detention Center Medical Staff
as 4:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jerome Blevins
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. 2005 Honda Foreman TRX 500 ES ATV Seized from James E. Blevins
as 6:2010mc00047
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
2005 Honda Foreman TRX 500 ES ATV Seized from James E. Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Blevins v. Meko
as 6:2010cv00024
Petitioner:
Paul Allen Blevins
Respondent:
Joseph Meko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blevins v. Meko
as 6:2010cv00007
Petitioner:
Paul Allen Blevins
Respondent:
Joseph Meko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Infinity Business Group, Inc. v. Cordell et al
as 6:2009cv00294
Plaintiff:
Infinity Business Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Wade B. Cordell, Wade B. Cordell, Bradshaw O. Cordell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
