Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Blevins v. USA
as 4:2009cv00405
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin Wayne Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Blevins v. Milam County, Tx et al
as 6:2008cv00334
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ray Blevins
Defendant:
Milam County, Tx and David Greene, .
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stone v. Blevins et al
as 6:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeffery Stone
Defendant:
Dennis K. Blevins, Micheal Sizemore, Danford L. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. City of Justin Municipality et al
as 4:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Graham
Defendant:
City of Justin Municipality, Mike Evans, Virginia Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blevins v. King et al
as 7:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
Roxanna Marie Blevins
Defendant:
B King and Gary Tucker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coon et al v. Bryan O. Blevins, P.C. et al
as 1:2007cv00923
Plaintiff:
Brent W. Coon, Brent W. Coon, Brent W. Coon and others
Defendant:
Bryan O. Blevins, P.C., Provost Umphrey Tobacco Partnership, Paul F. Ferguson, Jr. P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Ortiz v. Blevins et al
as 6:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
D Blevins, Unidentified Hasty, Unidentified Stanhope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright-Blevins v. Calfin Holdings Inc
as 4:2007cv00398
Plaintiff:
Karina Wright-Blevins
Defendant:
Calfin Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Munoz v. Fortner et al
as 6:2007cv00170
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Munoz
Defendant:
David Fortner, Dennis Blevins, Delton Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00159
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
N. Quarterman, D Blevins, FNU Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
