Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Reasnor v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Nolan W Reasnor
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc , Wal-Mart Stores East LP , Wal-Mart Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berenice Monarrez v. Blitz USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07090
Defendant:
Blitz USA, Inc., Does and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Berenice Monarrez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01386
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Weddle et al v. Blitz USA, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00651
Plaintiff:
Susan Weddle , Megan W. Smith , Adam Smith and others
Defendant:
Blitz USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mims et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
David Mims and Donna Mims
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Blitz USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Farm Lloyds v. Blitz USA, Inc.
as 6:2011cv00282
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Eric Balch, Eric Balch and Tammy Balch
Defendant:
Blitz U.S.A., LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Blitz USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Al-Shara v. Blitz USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv14954
Defendant:
Blitz USA, Inc. , LAM 2011 Holdings, LLC, Kinderhook Industries, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Majd Al-Shara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCLELLAND et al v. BLITZ USA INC
as 5:2011cv00335
Defendant:
BLITZ USA INC
Plaintiff:
DORSEY MCCLELLAND and SCOTT FELDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOYNER v. BLITZ USA INC
as 5:2011cv00334
Defendant:
BLITZ USA INC
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE JOYNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUILFORD v. BLITZ USA INC et al
as 5:2011cv00336
Defendant:
BLITZ USA INC , WALMART STORES INC , WALMART STORES EAST LP and others
Plaintiff:
WADE GUILFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
