Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Carlisle (Wiltshire)
as 23-6776
Defendant:
DIONDRE CARLISLE, RAKEEM FLOWERS, TYRONE SMITH and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN WILTSHIRE
United States of America v. Carlisle (Guerrero)
as 22-1311
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Diondre Carlisle, AKA Slim Gz, Rakeem Flowers, AKA Ra ra, Tyrone Smith, Gudda and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Saudy Guerrero, AKA SG
US v. Shiqwan Riddick
as 21-4169
Defendant / Appellant:
SHIQWAN RIDDICK, a/k/a Blizz
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Carlisle (Davis)
as 20-2462
Defendant:
Cesar Munguia, Darnell Kidd, AKA Donnie, AKA Blizz, AKA King Cruddy, Rakeem Flowers, AKA Ra ra and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mykai Davis
Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 20-362
Defendant:
Eliesel Llorens, AKA Alex, AKA Junior, Johnny Zapata, Sara Lee Medina and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel E. Roman, AKA Manny, AKA Pito
United States of America v. Carlisle (Flowers)
as 17-166
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Diondre Carlisle, AKA Slim Gz, Tyrone Smith, Gudda, Isaiah Washington, AKA Ah-ah and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rakeem Flowers, AKA Ra ra
USA v. Nisia Dunaway
as 11-3848
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NISIA KEVIN DUNAWAY, a/k/a Blizz
United States of America v. Diaz (Rivera)
as 10-1199
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nelson Luis Millet, Manuel E. Roman, AKA Manny, AKA Pito, Richard Morales, AKA Richie, AKA Orco and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gilberto Rivera, AKA Junco
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
