Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Sanchez v. Health Care Services Corporation et al.
as 1:2024cv10026
Plaintiff:
Christine Sanchez
Defendant:
Health Care Services Corporation, A Mutual Legal Reserve Company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, A Division of Health Care Service Corporation, A Mutual Legal Reserve Company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, A Division of Health Care Services Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanchez v. Health Care Services Corporation et al.
as 1:2023cv15857
Plaintiff:
Christine Sanchez
Defendant:
Health Care Services Corporation, A Mutual Legal Reserve Company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, A Division of Health Care Service Corporation, A Mutual Legal Reserve Company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, A Division of Health Care Services Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Fuller v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Scotty J. Fuller
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma and Health Care Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Beals v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 5:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Melissa Beals
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. Jane Phillips Memorial Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Genele Norton
Defendant:
Jane Phillips Memorial Medical Center, Inc., St. John Health System, Inc. and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Terry v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 21-6141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA TERRY, individually and on behalf of her minor child, G.T., and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, a mututal legal reserve company, DBA Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
