Cases
Justice v. Solomon et al
as 3:2023cv02135
Petitioner: Bilal Justice
Respondent: Bobbi Jo Solomon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOODY v. HARRY et al
as 3:2023cv00875
Plaintiff: Brandon Moody
Defendant: Laurel Harry, George Little, Tabb Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. SOLOMON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01256
Petitioner: OMAR MILLER
Respondent: BOBBY JO SOLOMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOODY v. HARRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00770
Plaintiff: BRANDON MOODY
Defendant: LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Cooper v. John Wetzel, et al
as 22-2409
Plaintiff / Appellant: TROY COOPER
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. WETZEL, in his individual and official capacity as Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, BOBBI JO SOLOMON, in her individual and official capacity as Deputy Superintendent of SCI Houtzdale, MICHELLE IVICIC, in her individual and official capacity as Program Manager at SCI Houtzdale and others
Defendant: DUBLER, in his individual and official capacity as Deputy Superintendent of SCI Houtzdale, FETSKO, in his individual and official capacity as Deputy Superintendent of SCI Houtzdale, MICHELLE IVICIC, in his individual and official capacity as Deputy Superintendent of SCI Houtzdale and others
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2016cv01726
Plaintiff: Quintez Talley
Defendant: Matthew McCoy, John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2015cv02174
Plaintiff: Quintez Talley
Defendant: Matthew McCoy, Debra Rand, Marcia Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?