Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Overton Pauley, et al v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 19-3666
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN BOYER, SOR, T. SMITH, BB Unit Case Counselor, CHASE FARREL, DA Unit Case Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STORMEY D. KISSELL, ZACHARY T. KING, WILLIAM RAY RHOADES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OVERTON WAYNE PAULEY, on behalf of Asatru/Odinist Faith Community
David Gambino v. Bobby Meeks, et al
as 17-1813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY L. MEEKS, H. BARRON, ASSISTANT WARDEN, VAN HORN, HEALTH ADMINISTRATOR and others
David Gambino v. Bobby Meeks, et al
as 16-3394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY L. MEEKS, Warden, H. BARRON, VAN HORN, Health Administrator and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PAULEY et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
OVERTON WAYNE PAULEY, ZACHARY T. KING, DAVID J. GOWER and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. , BOBBY L. MEEKS , HOWARD BARRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. FOSTER
Defendant:
CHARLES MAIORANA, WILLIAM R. FINK, CHARLES JR. SAMAELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCOY v. MEEKS
as 1:2015cv00066
Petitioner:
NAJEE MCCOY
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURNSIDE v. MEEKS
as 1:2015cv00044
Petitioner:
JOHN OTIS BURNSIDE
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ANDREOZZI v. MEEKS
as 1:2015cv00011
Petitioner:
ARMAND ANDREOZZI
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRIS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2014cv01700
Petitioner:
WALTER V. HARRIS
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
