Cases 61 - 70 of 2,756
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner:
Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Alford v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01380
Petitioner:
Weylin W. Alford
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantu Vela v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Horacio Cantu Vela
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 24-20155
Petitioner:
Larry Donal Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ: Case electronically transferred to (Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division).
as 6:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01305
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Guadalupe County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01276
Petitioner:
Aldede Lynch
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
