Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bradford v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00021
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Bradford
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
The Travelers Indemnity Company et al v. Forrest County et al
as 2:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company , The Travelers Indemnity Company of America , United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and others
Defendant:
Forrest County, City of Hattiesburg, Raymond Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bivens et al v. Forrest County et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bivens , Larry Ruffin , Bobby Ray Dixon and others
Defendant:
Forrest County , City of Hattiesburg , Raymond Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. E.M.C.F. (Medical) et al
as 4:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Allen
Defendant:
Unknown Nurse, Unknown Doctor and E.M.C.F. (Medical)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Allen et al
as 3:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Allen
Defendant:
Alisa Allen, Dan Duggan and Unknown Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. MDOC
as 3:2012cv00764
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Allen
Respondent:
MDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Allen et al
as 3:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Allen
Defendant:
Alisa Allen, Dan Duggan, Samuel V. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Woodall
as 2:2010cv00154
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Alford
Defendant:
Unknown Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Croom v. Thompson et al
as 2:2007cv00205
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Croom
Respondent:
Andrew Thompson, Jr. and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
