Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bobo v. Frost, PLLC et al
as 1:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Bobo
Defendant:
Frost, PLLC and John and Jane Does A;B;C;D;E and F
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bobo v. Irvin et al
as 3:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Bobo
Defendant:
L. T. Irvin, K. Gooden and J. Leaper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Mississippi By: Affidavit of Steven Tyler v. Bobo et al
as 4:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
State of Mississippi By: Affidavit of Steven Tyler
Defendant:
James R. Bobo , William L. Carter and John D. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drain v. Morris et al
as 4:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Drain
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Kenya Terry, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Mae Helen Jones Bobo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Davis v. Morris et al
as 4:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Saheed Davis
Defendant:
Timothy J. Morris, Jo Bobo, Pamela C. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ducksworth v. Bobo et al
as 4:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Nora Ducksworth
Defendant:
J Bobo, Carolyn Walker, J Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. City of Clarksdale et al
as 4:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Elbert Hines, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Clarksdale , William Whit Read , Jason Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Action E. Express, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Sentry Select Insurance Company
Defendant:
Action E. Express, LLC, Joseph W. Bobo, III and Kelly Dee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
