Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bean v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Joshua Bean
Defendant: Nancy Marthakis, Wilks, Stephanie Riley and others
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARDEN v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2023cv02250
Plaintiff: JAYDEN W. DARDEN
Defendant: KARL MARTINI, VOLGEMAN, WIEGAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. GARDENER et al
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff: SHAWN MARSHALL
Defendant: GARDENER, BOGGS, BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steffin McFall v. Sergeant Bass, et al
as 23-1690
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEFFIN T. MCFALL
Defendant / Appellee: SERGEANT BASS and BETTY BOGGS, Nurse
Pitts v. Neal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff: Kendal R Pitts
Defendant: Ron Neal, Novac, Lagvnas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Mendrick et al
as 1:2021cv02646
Defendant: Sgt. Strumillo, Commander Boggs, Commander Contwell and others
Plaintiff: Deon Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mendrick et al
as 1:2021cv02109
Defendant: John Doe, Ernistine, Colin Cantwell and others
Plaintiff: Robin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatlen v. Schoenberger et al
as 1:2021cv02021
Defendant: Commander Colin Cantwell, Crystal Pace, Commander Boggs and others
Plaintiff: Ken Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatlen v. Feeney et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Defendant: Romanelli, Bogg's, Cantwell and others
Plaintiff: Ken Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAUL v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2020cv00439
Plaintiff: E'NGAI MAUL
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, STEPHANIE SEERING, DANIEL LUNDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?