Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sampson v. Carrita et al
as 4:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Earl Sampson
Defendant:
1-10 John/Jane Doe, OFFICER NICHOLAS CARRITA, OFFICER RICHARD HOFFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federoff et al v. Geisinger Clinic et al
as 4:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
Theodore Federoff, Christine Baron, Melissa Barron and others
Defendant:
Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BONNELL v. SAUL
as 5:2021cv00073
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
KRISSY BONNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
BONNELL v. APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
as 2:2013cv02913
Plaintiff:
KENNETH P. BONNELL
Defendant:
APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BONNELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv59010
Plaintiff:
HUGH J. BONNELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Knight v. Chief Lowmiller & the South Williamsport Police Department et al
as 4:2011cv00493
Plaintiff:
Lawrence H Knight, II
Defendant:
Lowmiller, Diane Kemp Hoover, Al Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNELL v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31331
Plaintiff:
HUGH J. BONNELL
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOYD v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76309
Plaintiff:
BONNELL LOYD
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KNIGHT v. LOWMILLER et al
as 2:2008cv05212
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE KNIGHT, II
Defendant:
LOWMILLER, THE SOUTH WILLIAMSPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT, DIANE KEMP HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hart v. Whalen et al
as 3:2008cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jamal Hart
Defendant:
Walter Whalen, Barry Stahl, R. Scandle and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
