Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Page v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Page
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michael Tullgren v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 23-1366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL TULLGREN, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. and THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. EMPLOYEES' CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN, whose names are currently unknown
Tullgren v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
Michael Tullgren
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., The Board of Trustees of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan
Amicus Curiae:
The ERISA Industry Committee, The American Benefits Council and The American Retirement Association
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Mark v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Long -Term Disability Plan
as 1:2017cv00961
Plaintiff:
Fitzgerald Mark
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Long -Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Lewis-Bennett v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
DeAnna Lewis-Bennett
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BRUCE v. HARTFORD et al
as 1:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Linda Bruce
Defendant:
Hartford and Booz Allen Hamilton Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Fox v. Booz Allen Hamilton Long-Term Disability Income Plan
as 1:2007cv00508
Plaintiff:
Maura Fox
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton Long-Term Disability Income Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
