Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BENNETT v. BORDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
TYLER BORDEN, BARRETT and NOAH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. BALL et al
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
SAMANTHA BALL, DYLAN RUMER, MICHAEL HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Harold Alexander Lee Borden
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Yancey, Bradford and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERTEL et al v. ACTION TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01748
Plaintiff:
SPENCER SMITH, BRIAN BORDEN, MICHAEL BARNETT and others
Defendant:
ACTION TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., LESLIE PANNELL, CONNOR PANNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVID DEBOARD v. STONE CREST DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00116
Defendant:
BORDEN RIDGE, INC., F/K/A SDR DEVELOPMENT, INC., STONE CREST DEVELOPMENT, LLC and STEVE L. THIENEMAN
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND BY ITS TRUSTEES, LINDELL K. LEE AND D.R. BORDEN, JR. v. C.C. BOONE & CO., INC.
as 3:2010mc00022
Defendant:
C.C. BOONE & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND BY ITS TRUSTEES, LINDELL K. LEE AND D.R. BORDEN, JR.
BORDEN v. FINNAN
as 2:2008cv00384
Petitioner:
JAMES BORDEN
Respondent:
ALAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BORDEN v. FINNIN
as 2:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
JAMES BORDEN
Defendant:
ALLEN FINNIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
