Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Pinski v. City of Philomath et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Cynthia Pinski
Defendant: City of Philomath, Blake Bowers, City of Corvallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barton v. Bower et al
as 6:2024cv00140
Plaintiff: Dale Alan Barton
Defendant: Andrew L. Bower, MD, Michelle Davies, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01630
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bowers Sullivan v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv01571
Plaintiff: Donna J. Bowers Sullivan
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Kane et al v. Consumer Cellular, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01558
Plaintiff: John Kane and Mary Bowers
Defendant: Consumer Cellular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bowers v. Aguilar, et al.
as 6:2020cv01141
Plaintiff: Robert Bowers
Defendant: Pablo Aguilar and One World Delivery Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowers v. Boeing Company
as 3:2019cv01752
Plaintiff: Dean Bowers
Defendant: The Boeing Company and Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
S.W. v. State of Oregon et al
as 1:2019cv00715
Plaintiff: S. W. and Suzanne Mendelson
Defendant: Cindy Laird, State of Oregon and Diane Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. Short et al
as 2:2019cv00570
Defendant: Troy Bower, S. Boston, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff: Michael M. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Perrson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00395
Plaintiff: Lederrick Nesbitt
Defendant: Rob Perrson, Brault, Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?