Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00872
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson Dunn
Plaintiff:
Bert Christopher Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Woods et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Albert Flowers, Jr.
Defendant:
Walter Woods, Juliana Dodd, Warden Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. RDAP-BOP et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2017cv00767
Plaintiff:
Albert Flowers, Jr.
Defendant:
RDAP-BOP , M. Laguna , Warden Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frazier v. Reynolds et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
Sibley G. Reynolds, Court of Criminal Appeals, Alabama Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Price et al
as 5:2011cv00530
Petitioner:
Reginald Bowers
Respondent:
Sheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowers v. Jones et al
as 2:2009cv01133
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Bowers
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackburn v. Bowers (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00463
Plaintiff:
W. Mason Blackburn
Defendant:
Robert L. Bowers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawes v. Bowden et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00930
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Hawes
Defendant:
Tracey M. Bowden, Sue Roberts, Gary Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henry v. Baylor et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Thaddeus Henry
Defendant:
Arthur Baylor, Bobby Bright, Officer Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
