Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Parks v. Haynes et al
as 3:2017cv05884
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E Parks
Defendant:
Ron Haynes, Bernard Warner, Jody Becker-Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00577
Defendant:
Clark College, Blake Bowers, Jane Doe Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Amedee et al v. Xerox Business Services, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00880
Plaintiff:
Treascia Amedee , Isaac D Arias , Rigoberto Botello and others
Defendant:
Xerox Business Services, LLC, Livebridge, Inc., Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Payne v. Strong et al
as 3:2014cv05854
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bryant Payne
Defendant:
Mark Strong, Dorian Diaz, Byron Eagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bower v. Look Cycle International et al
as 3:2014cv05561
Plaintiff:
David Bower and Sabrina Bower
Defendant:
Look Cycle International, Chain Reaction Cycles Ltd. and Chain Reaction Cycles Retail Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rygg et al v. Hulbert et al
as 2:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rygg and Craig Dilworth
Defendant:
David F Hulbert, Larry McKeeman, G Geoffrey Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rygg et al v. Hulbert
as 2:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rygg and Craig Dilworth
Defendant:
David F Hulbert, Larry McKeeman, G Geoffrey Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
