Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Uhler et al
as 9:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop, S. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Reginald Bishop, Hill, Vesenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyer v. Tedford
as 9:2021cv01284
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Boyer
Respondent:
Jeffrey Tedford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Borders El Bey v. Doe #31 et al
as 6:2017cv06565
Plaintiff:
Michael Borders El Bey
Defendant:
John Doe #31, John Doe #32, Marianne Yaru and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valdiviezo v. City of New York
as 17-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mario Valdiviezo
Defendant - Appellee:
Captain Boyer, George R. Vierno Center, City of New York, Ayou, Correction Officer, George R. Vierno Center and others
Defendant:
George R. Vierno Center, G.R.V.C., Rikers Island and George Motchan Detention Center, G.M.D.C., Rikers Island
Barrett v. Boyer et al
as 9:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
Kevin Boyer, Roxanne Reimer, Elisabeth Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdiviezo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03902
Plaintiff:
Mario Valdiviezo
Defendant:
The City of New York and Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Smith et al
as 9:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Randal J. Smith, David Rock, Eric M. Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClemore v. Bosco et al
as 9:2014cv00626
Plaintiff:
Antonio McClemore
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, Corey Connelly, Kevin Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
