Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BOYER v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
FRANK BOYER
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SOMERSET COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyer v. McGinley et al
as 1:2019cv01835
Petitioner:
Donald Edward Boyer, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley, PA State Attorney General and Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYER v. WARDEN SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON
as 1:2018cv12001
Petitioner:
ANDRE BOYER
Respondent:
WARDEN SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyer v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv00834
Petitioner:
Hasaan Boyer
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Steven Wesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricky Boyer v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 15-1864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY DEON BOYER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jay Boyer, Jr. v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI
as 14-3273
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAY BOYER, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Boyer v. Tritt et al
as 3:2014cv00600
Petitioner:
Brian Boyer
Respondent:
Brenda Tritt, PA Board of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYER v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2012cv01532
Petitioner:
RICKY DEON BOYER
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYER v. LAMAS et al
as 5:2012cv01908
Petitioner:
BRUCE GREGORY BOYER
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, CRAIG STEAELMEN and LINDA KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYER v. CAMDEN SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2012cv01195
Petitioner:
ANDRE BOYER
Respondent:
CAMDEN SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGE EYNON, MINDY MELLETS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
