Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner:
Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent:
Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nanney v. Boyle
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
James David Nanney
Defendant:
David Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Boyle v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Maureen E. Boyle
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc. and Publix North Carolina LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KING v. BYERS et al
as 1:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL KING
Defendant:
CLARENCE BYERS and T.F. BOYLE TRANSPORTATION, INC. doing business as BOYLE TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ALEXANDER v. BOYLES et al
as 1:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER
Defendant:
M.G. BOYLES, A.C. SHORES, III and JULIA GULLETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Boyle
as 5:2022ct03090
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDS v. FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
DONTAY WILDS
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL, RON FREEMAN, CORRECT CARE SOLITIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Chief Judge et al
as 5:2022ct03011
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chief Judge, James N. Ishida, Judge Terrence Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Honeycutt et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Johnathan A. Fuller
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, James Waldroop, Landon Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020ct03301
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle, Vince M. Rozier, Jr., Joshua Stein and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
