Cases 21 - 30 of 143
Farley et al v. Potter et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Chad Farley and Jessica Farley
Defendant:
Wayne Potter, Teddy Bales, Lonnie Larue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORAN v. MCGEE et al
as 1:2021cv01102
Defendant:
SHERRY DOCKINS-PRITCHETT, DONALD E. PARISH, WAYNE FUQUA and others
Plaintiff:
MYRA CHARLENE HORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Hancock Co Sherif Dept et al
as 3:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Sammy Russell
Defendant:
Roxie, Cole Setsor, Zackery Thorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diei v. Boyd et al
as 2:2021cv02071
Defendant:
Charles Hatcher, Decosta Jenkins, Jamie Woodson and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Diei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hubbard v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of et al (TV2)
as 2:2020cv00206
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Brad Lee Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberts et al v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc
as 1:2020cv02685
Plaintiff:
Edna Roberts, Nellie Winfrey, Taliah Elliott and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi S.A., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Anderson Cnty, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00375
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Anderson Cnty, TN, Dep. Perkins and others
Plaintiff:
James Brad Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
