Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Zelesnik v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Joe Citero, John Rice and others
Hayes v. Barthuly et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Harold Eugene Hayes
Defendant:
Brad Barthuly, Devin Nielsen, Alysta Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denney v. Valentine
as 6:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Brad Lawrence Denney
Respondent:
Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Brad Simpson
Defendant:
Angela Johnson, Shelley Santry, Claudette Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diehl v. AutoZoners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Diehl
Defendant:
AutoZoners, LLC and Brad Welch Jakubcani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Akers v. Hicks et al
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Lena Akers
Defendant:
Deputy Gary Hicks, Aaron Acree, Trigg County Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Occupational Health Centers of the Southwest, P.A. (TX)
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Brad Stephens
Defendant:
Occupational Health Centers of the Southwest, P.A. (TX)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fields v. Hopson et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Fields
Defendant:
Jere Dee Hopson, Brad Harper, Stephen Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riggs et al v. Wright et al
as 3:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Riggs and Aurora Cheyenne Riggs
Defendant:
James Cameron Wright, Brad Holloman and Travis Dalton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
