Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAUDENBUSH v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
BRAD RAUDENBUSH
Respondent:
C. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Voelz et al
as 3:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph West
Defendant:
Brad Voelz and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Miller
as 3:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Eberaia D Fields and Eberaia Fields
Defendant:
Brad Miller
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZEMLICK v. BURKHART et al
as 1:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ZEMLICK
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRAD BURKHART, MATTHEW BOOTS, LUKE SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRURY v. BURKHART et al
as 2:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. DRURY
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, BRIDGER D. FOY, JOHN LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASSWATER v. PHILIPS et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
BRAD PASSWATER
Defendant:
JENNIFER PHILIPS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, SKYLAR SAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYNARD v. BURKHART et al
as 1:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and QUALITY HEALTH CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LAPPE et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JOHNSON
Defendant:
DEREK LAPPE, ANDREW DILE, SHERIFF OF VANDERBURGH COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
