Cases 21 - 30 of 2,119
Bell v. State of Texas - TDCJ et al
as 4:2019cv02889
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bell
Respondent:
State of Texas - TDCJ and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grohoske et al v. Livingston et al
as 1:2019cv00328
Plaintiff:
Diann Hazelwood Grohoske, Roy Lester Grohoske and David Lester Grohoske
Defendant:
Calvin R Grohoske, Non-governmental Entities, Governmental Entities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Stephens et al
as 4:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rissie Owens, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela v. Collier et al
as 9:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pasco v. Livingston
as 3:2019cv01237
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Petitioner:
Vincent Pasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Guthrie et al
as 2:2019cv00101
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Randy Guthrie, Vince Guthrie and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Guthrie et al
as 6:2019cv00026
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Randy Guthrie, Vince Guthrie and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela v. Collier et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drones v. State of Texas Courts et al
as 4:2019cv00248
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, State of Texas Courts, Employees and others
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Livingston et al Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Texas - Sherman Division.
as 4:2018cv00762
Defendant:
Michael Butcher, John Kissinger, Mike Ganzer and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
