Cases 1 - 10 of 275
VINES et al v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv02085
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VINES and BRADFORD WICKS
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
A.M.M. v. Adelphoi Services Inc., et al
as 4:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
A.M.M.
Defendant:
Adelphoi Services Inc., Bradford County, Jessica Vanderpool, Adelphoi Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURRELL v. ARMEL et al
as 1:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
Donald C. Burrell
Respondent:
Eric Armel, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and The Attorney General Of The State Of Pa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURRELL v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2023cv01253
Petitioner:
DONALD C. BURRELL
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PERRONG v. BRADFORD
as 2:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R PERRONG
Defendant:
MATTHEW BRADFORD and CLEO COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BRADFORD v. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
BOBBY BRADFORD
Defendant:
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
