Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Odette Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
as 23-15260
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ODETTE R. BATIS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.
Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Odette R. Batis
Defendant:
Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Albert Zuniga v. King County, et al
as 22-35009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT B. ZUNIGA, Zombie Tech Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY, CITY OF SEATTLE, JENNY ANNE DURKAN and others
Jonathan Ellis v. Dun and Bradstreet, Inc., et al
as 19-56413
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JONATHAN C. ELLIS, Dr.; an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
DUN AND BRADSTREET, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv07160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jonathan Ellis v. Dun and Bradstreet, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10077
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., Dun and Bradstreet, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dr Jonathan C Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Bradstreet et al
as 3:2017cv02257
Plaintiff:
Tamiko Powell
Defendant:
Angela Bradstreet, Ronald Quidachay and Ernest Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Thomas, et al v. Dun and Bradstreet Credibility
as 17-55486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. THOMAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
JAMES E. PENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DUN AND BRADSTREET CREDIBILITY CORP.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Michael Brang v. RMS- Recovery Management Services, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01304
Plaintiff:
Michael Brang
Defendant:
Does, Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., RMS- Recovery Management Services, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
