Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Guadiana v. Huffman et al
as 1:2024cv00252
Defendant:
John Doe, Inmate #3, John Doe, Inmate #2, John Doe, Inmate #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rivera Guadiana
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rawls v. Huffman et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Defendant:
Unknown Hicks, Unknown Robinson, Brand Huffman and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellis Rawls
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Huffman
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Edward Barnes, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGraw v. Huffman
as 3:2024cv00352
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGraw
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Huffman
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Green
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beale v. Huffman
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Jerry Beale, Jr.
Respondent:
Brand Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dye v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Dye
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Brand Huffman, J. Canale and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Erby Dean Jackson, Jr., Moshe Ariel Israel and Moshe Aryeh Israel
Defendant:
Burl Cain, James Wilkins, Michael Dright and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Huffman et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
Brand Huffman, Unknown Zennar and Unknown Cuttingham
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
