Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Turner et al v. Americold Logistics LLC
as 1:2023cv05843
Plaintiff:
Branden Turner and Brandice Turner
Defendant:
Americold Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bracy v. Americold Logistics LLC
as 1:2023cv05743
Plaintiff:
Lamont Bracy
Defendant:
Americold Logistics LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Hakeem Lee, Timothy Clark, Michelle Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Toombs v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2023cv03136
Plaintiff:
Branden Toombs
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Social Security Regional Administrator-NEF Only
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bailey v. Warran
as 1:2020cv01191
Plaintiff:
Branden Bailey
Defendant:
Cobb County Sheriff Neil Warran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Warren
as 1:2020cv00868
Plaintiff:
Branden Bailey
Defendant:
Neil Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiss v. Frost et al
as 2:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Stephen Cain, Johnathen Segars, J. Randall Frost and others
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Kiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIUDICE v. BALL et al
as 5:2019cv00153
Defendant:
BRANDEN GODFREE, CORDERO WILIS, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Plaintiff:
NELSON DEL GIUDICE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. State of Georgia
as 1:2018cv05301
Plaintiff:
Branden Perry and Brenden Perry
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Dr. Richards, City of Powder Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
