Cases 1 - 10 of 21
JENNINGS v. MILLER et al
as 2:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
QUINTON LEE JENNINGS
Defendant:
BRANDON MILLER, DEBRA HALL and DALTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
ZATECKY, BRANDON MILLER, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
JOSHAWA S. COLLINS
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, SMITH, BRANDON MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. MILLER et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
BRANDON MILLER, TRICIA PRETORIUS, JEREMY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIELDS v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
JACONIAH FIELDS
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, DEBORAH HALL and BRANDON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEMPER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02377
Plaintiff:
GERALD KEMP and GERALD KEMPER
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, BRANDON MILLER, DEBRA HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS
Defendant:
TODD NEAL, DORA ALLERNA, TYLEAH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCK v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv01633
Defendant:
AMANDA COPELAND, ARAMARK CORPORATION and BRANDON MILLER
Plaintiff:
S. TUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARTLOW v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv01092
Defendant:
AMANDA COPELAND, ARAMARK CORPORATION and BRANDON MILLER
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PARTLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAMLEY v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv01064
Defendant:
AMANDA COPELAND, ARAMARK CORPORATION and BRANDON MILLER
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRAMLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
