Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sharp v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Randy William Sharp
Defendant:
Brant Smith, Upshur County District Attorney Office and Upshur County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lopez v. East Texas Treatment Facility et al
as 6:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Luis B. Lopez
Defendant:
East Texas Treatment Facility, M. Upshaw, Practice Manager MTC Brant Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemer v. UTMB Medical et al
as 6:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Defendant:
UTMB Medical, Warden Unknown Upshaw, Brant Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales v. Upshaw et al
as 6:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
Robert Rosales
Defendant:
Unknown Upshaw, Brant Cain, UTMB Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Harris County Pct. #5 Constable's Office et al
as 4:2020cv03775
Defendant:
Dep. Jane Doe, Harris County Pct. #5 Constable's Office, Dep. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brant Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Livingston et al
as 3:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Mark Robert, M.D. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Livingston et al
as 4:2018cv01028
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Hood
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Brant Collier, Owen Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2010cv00811
Defendant:
FNU Borrows, City of San Antonio, Ted Michael Grill and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brant Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Grill et al
as 5:2010cv00092
Defendant:
FNU Borrows, Ted Michael Grill and Pamela A. Henderson
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brant Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampere v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00700
Petitioner:
Thomas Brant Sampere
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
