Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brennan v. WhistlePig, LLC
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
AnnMarie Brennan
Defendant:
WhistlePig, LLC doing business as Whistlepig Whiskey doing business as The Whistle Pig Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Doe v. Vermont Law School et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Vermont Law School, Shirley Jefferson, Heidi Remick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crosson v. McKenna et al
as 5:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Matthew Birmingham, Hugh O'Donnell, Robert McKenna and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Conrad v. Brennan
as 2:2018cv00221
Defendant:
Megan Brennan
Plaintiff:
Jonathon D. Conrad
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
In Re: $9,500 U.S. Currency, et al
as 2:2016mc00136
Movant:
United States of America
Claimant:
Justin Brennan
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Centrella et al v. RitzCraft Corporation of Pennsylvania et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Carmine Centrella and Mary Brennan-Centrella
Defendant:
RitzCraft Corporation of Pennsylvania and Mountain View Modular Homes, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. Brennan Beer Gorman / Architects, LLP et al
as 1:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
Hunt Construction Group, Inc. and Hunt Construction Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Brennan Beer Gorman / Architects, LLP and Wilson Associates
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. Brennan Beer Gorman / Architects, P.C. et al
as 1:2008cv00065
Plaintiff:
Hunt Construction Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Brennan Beer Gorman / Architects, P.C., Wilson Associates, S. DeSimone Consulting Engineers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
