Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Scarcelli v. Farmers Insurance Exchange et al
as 6:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jamie Scarcelli
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance Exchange, Farmers New World Life Insurance Company and Brent Earl Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Brent Hall
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Rich v. Baird et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harpole et al v. Wesco Insurance Company et al
as 5:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Brent Harpole, Leslie Harpole and Harp Plumbing Design Inc doing business as Champion Plumbing
Defendant:
Wesco Insurance Company, Security National Insurance Company and Amtrust North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SMH US LLC v. 1110 Linwood Blvd LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
SMH US LLC
Defendant:
1110 Linwood Blvd LLC and Brent Irish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wensauer et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brent Wensauer and Katherine Wensauer
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dollarhide v. Dickens et al
as 5:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Jason R Dollarhide
Defendant:
Dennis Dickens, Oklahoma Highway Patrol, Mike Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Brent Allen Morris
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
