Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 23-15164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity and others
Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 22-15600
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity and others
USA v. James Zimmerman
as 20-10418
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES BRETT ZIMMERMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Karriem v. County of Clark, Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv01915
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Suzan Baucum, City of Las Vegas and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Garner Karriem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimmerman v. USA
as 3:2016cv00312
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Brett Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Evans v. MGM Grand Hotel, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01988
Plaintiff:
John Evans
Defendant:
LVMPD Officer Cindy Fasulo, LVMPD Officer Doe Fasulo, LVMPD Officer Dennis Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. James Zimmerman
as 11-17471
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES BRETT ZIMMERMAN
James Zimmerman v. USDC-NVR
as 11-70347
:
In re: JAMES BRETT ZIMMERMAN
Petitioner:
JAMES BRETT ZIMMERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RAPPUCCI et al v. HERKER PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INC.
as 2:2010cv05491
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAPPUCCI and BRETT ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
HERKER PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zimmerman v. USA
as 3:2008cv00203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Brett Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
