Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Dittimus v. Sloan
as 1:2012cv02840
Petitioner:
Corri Dittimus
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Afola v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv02394
Plaintiff:
Lagalia A. Afola and Lagalia (I) A. Afola
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Brigham Sloan, Brigham (I) Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dittimus v. Sloan
as 1:2012cv02359
Petitioner:
Corri Dittimus
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barron v. Bent County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv02278
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Barron
Defendant:
Bent County Correctional Facility, Brigham Sloan , Jan Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jackie Flowers
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Brigham Sloan, Brigham (I) Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phan v. Sloan et al
as 1:2011cv02353
Petitioner:
Long Ba Phan
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv01677
Plaintiff:
Michael Brackeen, Andres Hoepker, Randolph Smith and others
Defendant:
Tony Carochi, Ari Zavaras, Teresa Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dreibholz v. Sloan et al
as 1:2011cv01373
Petitioner:
James Dreibholz
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murray v. Sloan et al
as 1:2011cv00992
Petitioner:
Carey A. Murray
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
