Cases 1 - 10 of 110
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WARLOW v. BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. et al
as 5:2023cv04794
Plaintiff:
ADAM WARLOW
Defendant:
BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. and JAMES NODEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MATOS v. BRIGHT et al
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MATOS
Defendant:
MR. J. BRIGHT and MS. LAURENE DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv03791
Plaintiff:
AKHENATON JONES
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GREGORY VRATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
DORIAN DAVENPORT
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, BRAD VASY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC v. THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC
Defendant:
THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Talley v. Savage et al
as 1:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Judge Timothy J. Savage, John E. Wetzel, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MILLER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
DARREN L. MILLER
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, MR. BRIGHT and C/O 1 SHEETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIGHT v. USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2021cv02283
Plaintiff:
RUTH BRIGHT
Defendant:
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
