Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Telly Bristol v. Olinger
as 24-6322
Plaintiff:
TELLY SAVALAS BRISTOL
Defendant:
NURSE PRACTITIONER OLINGER, DR. HAYNES, Psych Senior, BATEMAN, Assistant Warden and others
Johnson v. Stine et al
as 7:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ternae Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Off. Christopher Stine, Sgt. Aaron Hankins, Off. M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack Bristol v. Warden C. Carter
as 23-6355
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACK RUSSEL BRISTOL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN C. CARTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00776
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bristol v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Telly Savalas Bristol
Defendant:
David Anderson, Dr. Olinger, Dr. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent v. Bristol VA City Jail
as 7:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Jessica Nicole Kent
Defendant:
Bristol VA City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renoir v. McDuffy et al
as 7:2021cv00394
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Renoir and Stones
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffy, WRSP Mental Health Staff, WRSP Nursing Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Medical & Mental Health Staffs at Duffield Jail and Sullivan County, T.N Jails et al
as 7:2021cv00300
Defendant:
Captain Major Parks, Jeffery Hamilton, Bristol Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Chad Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Northam et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Pocahontas Correctional Center, Ralph Northam, USP Marion, IL. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
