Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Raymond Crochet v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 19-30026
Defendant / Appellee:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INCORPORATED and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND CROCHET
MCI Communications Services,, et al v. Buggs Island Telephone Coop.,, et al
as 18-10781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
BUGGS ISLAND TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, LUMOS NETWORKS INCORPORATED, formerly known as nTelos Network Incorporated and others
Peter Casey v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 18-50380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER B. CASEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INCORPORATED
Allegiance Bank Texas v. M/V Lake Limo, et al
as 17-41048
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALLEGIANCE BANK TEXAS
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK CALDWELL, as guarantor, in personam and ASHLEY RYANN CALDWELL, as guarantor, in personam
Interested Party - Appellee:
BRISTOL 2000 MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED and SHANNON HOLLAR
Cory Jenkins v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 16-31133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORY JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INCORPORATED
Joshua White v. John Bristol, et al
as 13-10800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA O'NEAL WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. BRISTOL, C/O III, Smith Unit and WILLIAM H. JOHN, III, Assistant Warden, Smith Unit
James Caldwell v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi, et al
as 12-90065
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JAMES BUDDY CALDWELL
Defendant - Petitioner:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB SANOFI PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDING PARTNERSHIP, SANOFI-AVENTIS, U.S.L.L.C., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INCORPORATED and others
Paul Clark v. Jane Waters, et al
as 10-20110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE WATERS, BETH BARRON, HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
